Saturday, September 11, 2004

The Unabomber

I am surprised at what you say about there being no evidence of a link between Logical Positivism and the Unabomber. A google, or msn, search on the terms "Unambomber Logical Positivism" yields pointers to several pages, all related to Alston Chase's recent book Harvard and the Unabomber: The Education of an American Terrorist. I have ordered it on amazon, and will wait to have read it before coming to a definite conclusion. However, accounts of it contain passages, such as those below, that seem to leave no doubt about Chase's opinion on the matter :

...he absorbed the message of positivism, which demanded value-neutral reasoning and preached that (as Kaczynski would later express it in his journal) "there is no logical justification for morality."


Chase's description of the intellectual climate at Harvard begins on page 201 and it revolves around a philosophy called logical positivism, which developed during the 1920s. It claimed "ethical judgments, being empirically unverifiable, were meaningless" and merely expressed our emotions about "certain kinds of behavior.

The question now is whether Chase makes a convincing case of linking LP to the Unabomber. I will not pronounce myself on that until I have read the book. One thing is sure, however. It is that LP's influence at Harvard in the 1950s was great, as it was in all major western universities around the world at that time. And no one seems to doubt that Ted Kaczynski's formative years at Harvard played a role in his subsequent metamorphosis into the Unabomber.

An additional remark : it is not enough to prove that Kaczynski was crazy to write him off, because it may well be that it is LP (and other aspects of his experience at Harvard) that made him crazy. Psychology is not yet advanced enough to put forward conclusive accounts of how someone can become mentally ill. But there are reports (results of tests) that seem to establish beyond doubt that Kaczynski had no visible mental imbalance before going to Harvard. I believe that seeing how LP can undermine trust can provide us with a plausible account of how someone can lose his mental balance.

3 Comments:

At September 12, 2004 at 7:51 PM, Blogger Doctor Logic said...

Let's suppose that Kacynski was free from psychosis. He was clearly a maladjusted individual. Your suggestion is that logical positivism is what caused his maladjustment. I don't think this is reasonable. He may have used LP as a justification for his actions, but LP does not direct that you should start blowing people up to make a political statement.

LP says that there are no ethical propositions that are true a priori. In other words, we make our own ethics and morality. I claim that a socially adjusted person with normal friends and family relationships cannot be perverted by LP. Further, someone who is maladjusted can find justification in any perverse set of values. For example, Eric Rudolph, the Atlanta bomber, was motivated by a form of Christian fundamentalism.

The fact is that there are no ethical propositions that are true a priori. If you want to promote a particular set of ethics, I think that is a good thing, but don't pretend that ethical claims are true a priori.

The only ethical claims that have any weight are those that are justified by science and a set of goals.

Suppose we define our ethical goal as "a stable society that promotes individual life, happiness, liberty and self-improvement." Things that are "good" are consistent with this goal, and things that are "bad" are inconsistent.

We can use social sciences, psychology, history, game theory etc. to deduce conclusions like "random executions are bad".

You might see this as a very weak ethical system because it has no authority. That is, no one has to agree with the ethical goal I laid out. However, this is still much more powerful than any claim from authority.

doctor(logic)

 
At April 28, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice respond in return of this matter with real arguments and describing
the whole thing on the topic of that.

Feel free to surf to my blog post: http://gto120dlaocm402mfos02.com

 
At April 8, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

ninest123 16.04
nike free, polo ralph lauren outlet, tiffany and co, louis vuitton, nike air max, louis vuitton outlet, michael kors, replica watches, kate spade outlet, prada outlet, nike free, chanel handbags, louboutin, tiffany jewelry, louis vuitton outlet, oakley sunglasses, cheap oakley sunglasses, longchamp outlet, christian louboutin outlet, uggs on sale, louis vuitton, replica watches, nike outlet, louboutin outlet, ray ban sunglasses, tory burch outlet, nike roshe run, air jordan pas cher, oakley sunglasses, prada handbags, ralph lauren pas cher, sac longchamp, longchamp pas cher, ugg boots, louboutin pas cher, oakley sunglasses, ray ban sunglasses, ugg boots, burberry, ray ban sunglasses, oakley sunglasses, gucci outlet, polo ralph lauren outlet, louis vuitton, longchamp outlet, jordan shoes, louboutin shoes, nike air max, air max, longchamp

 

Post a Comment

<< Home