Thursday, September 09, 2004

Intermezzo

In the past two posts, I have tried to show that the latest version of LP you propose may still have some internal deficiencies and that, in any case, as other variants, it might have some adverse effects.

Your move, Doc.

2 Comments:

At September 9, 2004 at 12:10 PM, Blogger Doctor Logic said...

Hi Nicolas,

Thank you for your comments. I am really enjoying our discussion. It is forcing me to put my ideas down in more detail, and this is helping me understand things like Natural Language much more deeply.

I think that defeating the tenets of LP will be extremely difficult. To my mind, LP represents the simple consequences of logic and objective reality.

Even if one were to show that LP makes ethics harder for humans to implement (a claim I would dispute), it would not justify rejecting LP and claiming some sort of arbitrary moral "authority".

If reality is complex, so be it.

Regards,

doctor(logic)

 
At April 8, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

moncler, barbour jackets, ugg boots uk, moncler, canada goose, moncler, bottes ugg, wedding dresses, vans, canada goose uk, canada goose, converse outlet, replica watches, ray ban, pandora jewelry, moncler, thomas sabo, marc jacobs, canada goose outlet, barbour, pandora jewelry, louis vuitton, sac louis vuitton pas cher, moncler, canada goose, links of london, moncler outlet, moncler, converse, lancel, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, toms shoes, montre pas cher, ugg pas cher, canada goose outlet, karen millen, pandora charms, hollister, pandora charms, juicy couture outlet, canada goose, coach outlet, swarovski crystal, swarovski, gucci, louis vuitton, louis vuitton, moncler, supra shoes, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, doudoune canada goose, louis vuitton, juicy couture outlet
ninest123 16.04

 

Post a Comment

<< Home