Friday, September 24, 2004

More than Science?

...science is science, it has its own methods and is amazingly sucessful in its own domain, but it does not provide means to control our emotions.

Nicolas,

Are you saying that there is something outside science that is more successful at describing parts of the world? Specifically, that you believe that there is knowledge outside of mathematics and science?

You would not be alone in this belief. This belief dominates theology, philosophy and is probably accepted by more than 95% of the world's population. It is often said that science has its domain, and the supernatural has another.

Of course, the number of people subscribing to an idea is not a measure of its correctness.

What must one sacrifice to say that there is something more than science and mathematics? One must sacrifice either logic or the assumption that the universe is governed by physical laws.

Some people are happy to make these sacrifices. I am not one of those people. I have given a lot of thought to this. Suppose there are two domains, one that follows physical laws and one that does not. I can't see a way to bridge the two domains with human experience without destroying causality in the scientific domain. Thus, I have not been able to escape the conclusion that either the world is totally causal and accessible to science, or it is not at all causal.

As axiologist points out, emotion is perfectly within the realm of science. We each have statistical models of behavior that we have learned from our relationships with ourselves and with others. We can predict with better-than-even accuracy what the effects of various events will be on the average person. The more we know about someone, the better we can predict their behavior. At a physiological level we can look at blood pressure, blood chemistry, facial expressions, EEG's, brain scans and probably many other observables.

So, propositions about emotion are meaningful to logical positivists. Similarly, propositions about many other things are equally meaningful to the degree that they fall under the domain of science:

  • synthetic ethics

  • game theory and trust

  • language

  • human delusion

Logical positivism is not the bogeyman!

You also say that "science is honest because it is coherent with its own ethos." What you mean to say is that science is okay as long as we don't use it to actually make any decisions about personal or social matters.

But now we need science more than ever. The world is wracked by war and ignorance. Political powers use the irrationality and emotion of the people to gain support for their foolish plans. The people are suckered into supporting policies that are clearly going to hurt them in the future. The people will always be cheated this way as long as they are convinced that there is some supernatural power that will ensure everlasting life and final justice.

Perhaps philosophy was never going to have much impact on the average person. However, if it was to have any effect, philosophy would need to have come to some reasonable consensus. The philosophers' war on positivism has robbed philosophy of any beneficial effect it might have rendered to popular culture. Instead, philosophy's message to the common man is that it's okay to have faith instead of reason.

doctor(logic)

3 Comments:

At September 25, 2004 at 4:20 AM, Blogger fi11222 said...

Yes, Doc, there is something outside of science because many of our activities do not consist in 'describing parts of the world'.

No, Doc, there is no knowledge; only beliefs. Yes, there are many justified beliefs outside science.

To accept this you do not need to sacrifice logic or natural laws, only the connection you make between the two. In your eyes, Logic appears as the basis for a science of science. But it just can't deliver on that promise, as the debacle of LP shows. This mistaken belief is the only thing that needs to be jettisoned.

The really difficult part is this : once you have abandoned this idea; once you do not believe anymore that science is a super-general truth producing machine based only on completely universal logic (again, no such thing exists), you need to replace this belief by something.

If science is not that, what is it ? Well, you have to accept that it is a social construct of our culture and that its foundation is our specific values and traditions. Why is it so difficult to swallow ? Probably because it looks so much less powerful and secure that way.

As you say, we need science. But science cannot give us what we need. Science is not going to stop war or oppression. Come on, wake up ! We have TRIED already. And with what results. Why do you think it would yield better results this time ? This is just not CREDIBLE anymore.

Axiologist DOES NOT say that emotions are within the realm of science. He says there are interesting articles about what you can see on MRI displays and other devices when people have emotions. Does that give us CONTROL over our emotions ? Certainly not NOW. And we need something NOW to fight war, oppression and poverty.

If science is not a means to that end, what can we do ? Well, read history books, study litterature and law, observe people, see the way they react when they interact with us or between them. We are definitely NOT always cheated. Our culture provides us with ample means not to be, if we are serious about studying and mastering them.

I indeed think we should refrain to use "science" to make VALUE decisions in our lives. And I have explained why, to great lengths. This has led me to conclude that what we should turn our attention to again is faith. But still I maintain that I do not believe in God like the chistians, Jews or Muslims do. So why do I say that ? Are you sure you have considered this problem seriously enough ?

 
At September 25, 2004 at 4:30 AM, Blogger fi11222 said...

One more thing. What is 'the people'. I thought the people were you and I and everyone else.

Or do you think you (or science) can GUIDE 'the people' on the basis of some superior truth ? When a script starts like that, the movie generally ends up in tears.

 
At April 8, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

ugg boots, true religion jeans, tn pas cher, nike free run uk, ugg boots, hermes, lacoste pas cher, burberry outlet online, nike air max, abercrombie and fitch, hogan, hollister, michael kors, ralph lauren uk, true religion jeans, north face, north face, michael kors outlet, new balance pas cher, ray ban pas cher, michael kors outlet, coach outlet, oakley pas cher, michael kors, coach outlet, michael kors, true religion outlet, michael kors, lululemon, michael kors outlet, nike air max, converse pas cher, nike air max, coach purses, vanessa bruno, nike roshe, timberland, burberry, kate spade handbags, replica handbags, michael kors outlet, air force, ray ban uk, hollister pas cher, sac guess, nike blazer, true religion jeans, vans pas cher, mulberry, michael kors outlet

 

Post a Comment

<< Home